A Shorthand Notation for Recording
For all the reasons one might learn math or music notion, it is worth learning some system of string figure notation.
You could do math using only prose. Try this: Add the number four to the number three then multiply the resultant sum by two. Now subtract five from the result of the value obtained in the preceding step to arrive at the solution, which is nine.
But for the price of learning a few symbols you can reduce the verbosity down to: (4+3) x2-5=9
Prose is essential for those unfamiliar with a system of notation. But for anyone with more than a passing interest in math or string figures, notation is easier to use, clearer, far more concise (in the above you can read or write 11 characters much easier than 198), and uniform (everyone attempting a prose description will write something different).
T |
Thumb(s) |
pu |
pick up |
mr |
move right |
||||
r |
right |
l |
left |
Notes:
Discussion
Some of the abbreviations given above are used infrequently and one could argue that they be omitted. It could also be argued that additional shorthand notation is desirable, so whether the above list should be shorter (32 or so) or longer (45+) is open for discussion. Like any language, SFN should be open to change and improvement.
In creating a system of notation the questions to ask are: How many nouns, verbs, adjectives, and prepositions are needed for a complete language describing the making of string figures? What should the syntax of this language be? For each "word," what symbol should be used to represent it? Should all "words" be assigned abbreviations, or only those used frequently with prose filling in for the rest?
The proposed string figure "language" is based on English so far as the choice of abbreviations goes, but abbreviations more meaningful to other language users could be used by them. As long as there is a one to one correspondence between abbreviation and "word," it would be easy for computers to translate from one to the other.
I hesitate to propose the use of 12345 over TFMRL, even though the 12345 convention is currently in use, because I think that most people not already familiar with 1=thumb, etc. would prefer T=thumb, etc. as letters are more mnemonic. It is no great task, however, to learn both conventions, so I propose to dispense with the hobgoblin of consistency and suggest that both 12345 and TFMRL be used and considered equally acceptable.
The size of string used is important if some figures are to turn out well. When no size is specified, a #8S will do (that would be a string that, when not doubled, could be wrapped or looped around your palm 8 times). This gives a relative size that will be correct for each individual, as one person's hand could be twice the size of another's.
I am not proposing that string figures be described only using shorthand notation, although once you learn a system of notation you'll never go back to prose! My suggestion is that those with more than a passing interest in string figures should develop and use a system of notation if only for their personal use. Once learned, it is MUCH easier to read and record figures in shorthand. You could print a small pamphlet with a hundred or so of your favorite figures to carry in your pocket, and when you forget a figure or a move, it is MUCH easier to glance over concise notation than wade through pages of prose. If string figure students could agree to use the same system of notation, it would be easier for fellow enthusiasts to communicate.
For the benefit of the more advanced students, I propose that published figures be described using String Figure Notation (SFN) and, for the uninitiated, that they should also be described in plain prose. I think it is a mistake to sprinkle prose with shorthand abbreviations as it puts off beginners (let's see, does 2 refer to the forefinger or ring finger?) and we don't want to do that. The current system of describing figures (see Arctic String Figure Project) mixes about 23% notation with 77% prose, while SFN is about 96% notation.
If the prose description follows the syntax of the SFN description, it will be easier for readers to make the transition from prose to notation. The prose description could include additional information such as discussion of technique or special string requirements (size, diameter, smoothness) omitted from the SFN version. A section containing anything else of interest such as mythological or cultural significance, distribution, who/when collected, and so forth could follow the prose description. Even experts would probably want to refer to the prose version the first time they attempt a new figure.
To discuss string figure notation issues or contribute to this collection, please feel invited to join the following special interest group:
Subscribe by email to: String Figure Contributors
Or visit the web site: String Figure Contributors at Yahoo Groups
Critical comments welcomed by:
Eric Lee